000			01311cam a22002054a 4500
020			_a9780199575169 _cTZS 54,238.96
040			_aMUL _beng. _eAACR
082	0	4	_a347.013 LAS
100	1		_aLasser, Mitchel de S. -O. -L'E.
245	1	0	_aJudicial deliberations : _ba comparative analysis of judicial transparency and legitimacy / _cMitchel de S.-O.-L'E. Lasser.
260			_aOxford : _bOxford University Press , _cc2009.
300			_aix, 382 p. ; _c24 cm.
440		0	_aOxford studies in European law
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520			_aJudicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed
546			_aeng.
650		0	_aJudicial process _zEuropean Union countries.
650		0	_aElectronic books
942			_cBK
999			_c1410 _d1410